On 10/28/14, 3:48 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
Given your description of pg_background it looks an awful lot like
infrastructure to make Autonomous Transactions work, but it doesn't
even do that. I guess it could do in a very small additional patch, so
maybe it is useful for something.

What do you see as being missing for autonomous transactios?

BTW, what I think would make this feature VERY useful is if it provided the 
ability to fire something up in another backend and leave it running in the 
background. I think you can do that with FDW, but then you have the 
authentication PITA to deal with (and perhaps pg_background is a more efficient 
way to move data between backends than FDW, but that's just a guess...)
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to