On 11/04/2014 07:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > More generally, it seems like a grab bag of not terribly well designed > features, and the features that do seem well designed seem like they > ought to be more generic than just for int4 arrays. So to me it feels > like proof-of-concept experimentation rather than a production-grade > thing that we could feel good about moving into core.
Yah, as a user of intarray, I think it belongs as an external extension. Heck, I think it might get more attention as an external extension, and if it were external then folks could fork it and create versions that don't have operator conflicts. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
