Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > The urgency is that we should focus on getting to RC1. The issue is > > > > that we don't have anything to focus on, so why delay? > > > > > > well, right now, we are waiting for an updated 'supported platforms' list > > > due to having to put out beta5 :( > > > > The changes since our platform reports are _not_ platform-specific, so I > > don't think we need to run through all platforms again. Even so, it is > > good to wait until Monday to see if anything pops out. > > So, you are saying that the changes that tom made that required an initdb > of those testing will not impact, in any way, how postgresql operates on > any of those platforms that have been reported on already? > > tom, do you have as much confidence in your changes as bruce? if so, why > didn't we just go to RC1, instead of a beta?
I can answer that. The feeling was that because we were requiring initdb during beta, we needed _a_ beta with the new catalog format before going to RC1. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
