On Nov 4, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 11/3/14 5:17 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>> Please don't name anything "committs". That looks like a misspelling of >>> something. >>> >>> There is nothing wrong with >>> >>> pg_get_transaction_commit_timestamp() >>> >>> If you want to reduce the length, lose the "get". >> >> I am fine with that, I only wonder if your definition of "anything" only >> concerns the SQL interfaces or also the internals. > > I'd be fine with commit_ts for internals, but not committs.
I agree that committs is poor. But I'd argue for spelling out commit_timestamp everywhere. It is more clear and easier to grep. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
