On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Honestly, I am still not convinced that the centralized sequence server with > no local caching is something we should be optimizing for as that one will > suffer from performance problems anyway. And it can ignore the last_value > input from postgres if it choses to, so it's not like the currently proposed > patch forbids implementation of such AMs.
I can buy that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
