Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> I thought putting the partition boundaries into pg_inherits was a
> strange choice. I'd put it in pg_class, or in pg_partition if we
> decide to create that.
Yeah. I rather doubt that we want this mechanism to be very closely
tied to the existing inheritance features. If we do that, we are
going to need a boatload of error checks to prevent people from breaking
partitioned tables by applying the sort of twiddling that inheritance
allows.
> Maybe as anyarray, but I think pg_node_tree
> might even be better. That can also represent data of some arbitrary
> type, but it doesn't enforce that everything is uniform.
Of course, the more general you make it, the more likely that it'll be
impossible to optimize well.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
