On 11/12/2014 06:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> How did template0 even get a MultiXact? That sounds like they're really >> abusing the template databases. :( (Do keep in mind that MXID 1 is a special >> value.) > No, it's normal -- template0 does not have a multixact in any tuple's > xmax, but datminxid is set to the value that is current when it is > frozen. >
So, to follow up on this: it seems to me that we shouldn't be requiring freezing for databases where allowconn=false. This seems like a TODO to me, even possibly a backpatchable bug fix. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
