On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> wrote: > Re: Petr Jelinek 2014-11-25 <5474efea.2040...@2ndquadrant.com> >> >Patch committed. >> >> Thanks! > > I'm a bit late to the party, but wouldn't > > recovery_target_action = ... > > have been a better name for this? It'd be in line with the other > recovery_target_* parameters, and also a bit shorter than the imho > somewhat ugly "action_at_recovery_target". Looks like a good idea to me. Why not as well mark pause_at_recovery_target as deprecated in the docs and remove it in, let's say, 2 releases? -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
