On 4 December 2014 at 22:13, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 02/12/14 18:59, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm a bit late to the party, but wouldn't >>>>> >>>>> recovery_target_action = ... >>>>> >>>>> have been a better name for this? It'd be in line with the other >>>>> recovery_target_* parameters, and also a bit shorter than the imho >>>>> somewhat ugly "action_at_recovery_target". >>>> >>>> FWIW, I too think that "recovery_target_action" is a better name. >>> >>> I agree. >> >> >> +1. >> > > Here is patch which renames action_at_recovery_target to > recovery_target_action everywhere.
Thanks; I'll fix it up on Monday. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
