On 17 December 2014 at 06:07, Teodor Sigaev <teo...@sigaev.ru> wrote:
> I think this suggestion is misguided, and the patch itself needs
>> rethinking.  Instead of doing this, let's hack dynahash.c itself
>> to substitute a shim like this when it's told function == tag_hash and
>> keysize == sizeof(uint32).  Then we can remove any similar shims that
>> already exist, and possibly end up with a net savings of code rather than
>> adding more.
> done, actoually I found oid_hash shim only.
- hash_ctl.hash = oid_hash; /* a bit more efficient than tag_hash */
+ hash_ctl.hash = tag_hash; /* a bit more efficient than tag_hash */

I think the comment may need removed here.


David Rowley

Reply via email to