Bruce Momjian wrote: > I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in > head: > > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0 > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared: 0 > > I thought we got rid of the idea that 'Ts' means timestamp. Was this > part forgotten?
Do you have a specific reference? That's not the concern I remember, and I sure don't want to re-read that whole thread again. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
