On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
> > head:
> > 
> >     shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl:  0
> >     shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared:  0
> > 
> > I thought we got rid of the idea that 'Ts' means timestamp.  Was this
> > part forgotten?
> Do you have a specific reference?  That's not the concern I remember,
> and I sure don't want to re-read that whole thread again.

I remember the issue of using _ts and 'ts' inconsistently, and I thought
we were going to spell out timestamp in more places, but maybe I am
remembering incorrectly.

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to