On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in > > head: > > > > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0 > > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared: 0 > > > > I thought we got rid of the idea that 'Ts' means timestamp. Was this > > part forgotten? > > Do you have a specific reference? That's not the concern I remember, > and I sure don't want to re-read that whole thread again.
I remember the issue of using _ts and 'ts' inconsistently, and I thought we were going to spell out timestamp in more places, but maybe I am remembering incorrectly. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
