Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Can't we just move the test to run without parallelism? Its quite quick, so I > don't it'd have noticeable consequences timewise.
That just leaves the door open for somebody to add more tests parallel to it in future. TBH, I think we could have done without this test altogether; but if we're going to have it, a minimum expectation is that it not be hazardous to other tests around it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers