Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Can't we just move the test to run without parallelism? Its quite quick, so I 
> don't it'd have noticeable consequences timewise.

That just leaves the door open for somebody to add more tests parallel to
it in future.

TBH, I think we could have done without this test altogether; but if we're
going to have it, a minimum expectation is that it not be hazardous to
other tests around it.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to