Andres Freund <> writes:
> Can't we just move the test to run without parallelism? Its quite quick, so I 
> don't it'd have noticeable consequences timewise.

That just leaves the door open for somebody to add more tests parallel to
it in future.

TBH, I think we could have done without this test altogether; but if we're
going to have it, a minimum expectation is that it not be hazardous to
other tests around it.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to