On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Yeah, if we come up with a plan for X workers and end up not being able > to spawn that many then I could see that being worth a warning or notice > or something. Not sure what EXPLAIN has to do anything with it..
That seems mighty odd to me. If there are 8 background worker processes available, and you allow each session to use at most 4, then when there are >2 sessions trying to do parallelism at the same time, they might not all get their workers. Emitting a notice for that seems like it would be awfully chatty. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
