On 01/11/2015 02:36 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
a) Afaics only __int128/unsigned __int128 is defined. See
    https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fint128.html

Both GCC and Clang defines both of them. Which you use seems to just be a matter of preference.

b) I'm doubtful that AC_CHECK_TYPES is a sufficiently good test on all
    platforms. IIRC gcc will generate calls to functions to do the actual
    arithmetic, and I don't think they're guranteed to be available on
    platforms. That how it .e.g. behaves for atomic operations. So my
    guess is that you'll need to check that a program that does actual
    arithmetic still links.

I too thought some about this and decided to look at how other projects handled this. The projects I have looked at seems to trust that if __int128_t is defined it will also work.

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/configure#L7778
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/cairo/tree/build/configure.ac.system#n88

But after some more searching now I notice that at least gstreamer does not trust this to be true.

https://github.com/ensonic/gstreamer/blob/master/configure.ac#L382

Should I fix it to actually compile some code which uses the 128-bit types?

c) Personally I don't see the point of testing __uint128_t. That's just
    a pointless test that makes configure run for longer.

Ok, will remove it in the next version of the patch.

@@ -3030,6 +3139,18 @@ int8_avg_accum(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
  Datum
  int2_accum_inv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
  {
+#ifdef HAVE_INT128
+       Int16AggState *state;
+
+       state = PG_ARGISNULL(0) ? NULL : (Int16AggState *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
+
+       /* Should not get here with no state */
+       if (state == NULL)
+               elog(ERROR, "int2_accum_inv called with NULL state");
+
+       if (!PG_ARGISNULL(1))
+               do_int16_discard(state, (int128) PG_GETARG_INT16(1));
+#else
        NumericAggState *state;

        state = PG_ARGISNULL(0) ? NULL : (NumericAggState *) 
PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
@@ -3049,6 +3170,7 @@ int2_accum_inv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
                if (!do_numeric_discard(state, newval))
                        elog(ERROR, "do_numeric_discard failed unexpectedly");
        }

Hm. It might be nicer to move the if (!state) elog() outside the ifdef,
and add curly parens inside the ifdef.

The reason I did so was because the type of the state differs and I did not feel like having two ifdef blocks. I have no strong opinion about this though.

pg_config.h.win32 should be updated as well.

Is it possible to update it without running Windows?

--
Andreas Karlsson


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to