Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> writes:
> Re: Tom Lane 2015-01-10 <22432.1420915...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> So what I propose we do with this is patch HEAD and 9.4 only.
>> We need to do *something* in 9.4 to address Christoph's complaint, and
>> that branch is new enough that we can probably get away with changing
>> officially-unsupported APIs. The lack of other field complaints makes
>> me okay with not trying to fix these issues further back.
> The problem isn't present in 9.3 and earlier (at least with
> postfix-pgsql), so there's no need to go back further.
I've committed a fix for this in HEAD and 9.4.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
