On 23/01/15 00:40, Andreas Karlsson wrote:

- Renamed some things from int12 to int128, there are still some places
with int16 which I am not sure what to do with.

I'd vote for renaming them to int128 too, there is enough C functions that user int16 for 16bit integer that this is going to be confusing otherwise.

 Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to