On 01/27/2015 09:05 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-01-27 08:21:57 +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
On 01/23/2015 02:58 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 23/01/15 00:40, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
- Renamed some things from int12 to int128, there are still some places
with int16 which I am not sure what to do with.
I'd vote for renaming them to int128 too, there is enough C functions
that user int16 for 16bit integer that this is going to be confusing
otherwise.
Do you also think the SQL functions should be named numeric_int128_sum,
numeric_int128_avg, etc?
I'm pretty sure we already decided upthread that the SQL interface is
going to keep usint int4/8 and by extension int16.
Excellent, then I will leave my latest patch as-is and let the reviewer
say what he thinks.
--
Andreas Karlsson
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
