On 2015-02-17 12:18:41 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 2015-02-12 11:44:05 -0800, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > This obviously should not be the case. I'll have a look in a couple of 
> >> > hours. Until then you can likely  just work around the problem by 
> >> > creating the archive_status directory.
> >>
> >> Thank you. Just let me know if you need some extra info or debugging.
> >
> > No need for debugging. It's plain and simply a (cherry-pick) conflict I
> > resolved wrongly during backpatching. 9.3, 9.4 and master do not have
> > that problem. That whole fix was quite painful because every single
> > release had significantly different code :(. pg_basebackup/ is pretty
> > messy.
> > I'm not sure why my testsuite didn't trigger that problem. Possibly
> > because a retry makes things work :(
> >
> > Somewhat uckily it's 9.2 only (9.3, 9.4 and master look correct, earlier
> > releases don't have pg_receivexlog)
> 
> Are you planning to back-patch the fix to 9.2?

Now done. Thanks Sergey, Fujii. And sorry for the 9.2 screwup.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to