2015-02-20 22:25 GMT+01:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>:

> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:55:20PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > > Gave this patch a look.  In general it looks pretty good, but there is
> > > one troublesome point: it duplicates two functions from libpq into
> psql,
> > > including the URI designators.  This doesn't look very nice.
> >
> > My thinking behind this was that the patch is a bug fix and intended
> > to be back-patched, so I wanted to mess with as little infrastructure
> > as possible.
>
> Oh, so this is to be backpatched?  Yeah, I guess in the backbranch case
> it's acceptable to duplicate some bits, but I don't think this gives us
> blanket permission to do it in master.  So we need two versions of the
> patch.
>
> > > 2. export it in libpgcommon.  If we choose this option we should
> > > probably rename those functions, as in the attached patch.
> >
> > I'm not super attached to the names.
>
> Me neither.  Suggestions welcome.
>

I have not any problem with these names - it is related what it does.

"libpq_connstring_uri_prefix_length" is 100% correct

"libpq_connstring_is_recognized" is correct too .. the name is maybe long,
but this functions are not used 100x per day

Regards

Pavel


>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>

Reply via email to