On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > I'm going to mark this back to 'waiting on author' in case there's > something material that I've missed which you can clarify. I had > started this review thinking to help move it along but after re-reading > the thread and thinking about it for a bit, I came around to the other > side and therefore think it should probably be rejected. We certainly > appreciate the effort, of course.
Re-reading this thread there are 3 perplexed opinions from three different committers, and nobody pleading in favor of this patch except me, so let's simply mark this as rejected and move on. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
