On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:58:28AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Would you suggest removing the automated system completely, or keep it > > around > > and just make it possible to override it (either by removing the note that > > something is a patch, or by making something that's not listed as a patch > > become marked as such)? > > One counter-idea would be to assume every attachment is a patch _unless_ > the attachment type matches a pattern that identifies it as not a patch. > > However, I agree with Tom that we should go a little longer before > changing it.
Also, can we look inside the attachment to see if it starts with 'diff<space>'. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
