On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 3/12/15 5:41 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2015-03-11 20:55:18 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> I don't think so. Andres basically wanted a nontrival algorithm to >>> determine how much pruning to do during a read-only scan. And Robert >>> basically said, that's not really possible. >> >> I don't think either of us made really strong statements. > > I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. I just wanted to summarize > the thread as, Andres wanted more fine-tuning on the behavior, Robert > expressed serious doubts that that will lead to an acceptable result.
Or to put that another way, I'm not sure there's one behavior here that will please everybody. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
