On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:27:05PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I haven't seen a specific number, it might depend on exactly which cipher is > negotiated. See for example http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/ > What-is-the-reason-for-error-quot-SSL-negotiation-failed-error-04075070-rsa-routines-RSA-sign-digest-td43953.html > > All references I have foud say at least 2014 is safe and 512 is broken, but > there are points in betwee nthat apparently works in some cases only. > > I think if we say "use 1024 bits or more" we err on the safe side.
Did we ever decide on this? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
