On 7 February 2015 at 20:05, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote: > On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in >> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint, >> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same >> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts? > > > A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for > locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.
Committed. We move forwards, slowly but surely. Thanks for the patch. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, RemoteDBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers