On 7 February 2015 at 20:05, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
>> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?
> A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
> locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.

Committed. We move forwards, slowly but surely. Thanks for the patch.

 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, RemoteDBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to