On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 7 February 2015 at 20:05, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote:
>> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
>>> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
>>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
>>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?
>> A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
>> locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.
> Committed. We move forwards, slowly but surely. Thanks for the patch.

Cool! Thanks for showing up.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to