On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 2015-04-09 13:31:55 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > + <row> > > + > > <entry><structname>pg_stat_ssl</><indexterm><primary>pg_stat_ssl</primary></indexterm></entry> > > + <entry>One row per connection (regular and replication), showing > information about > > + SSL used on this connection. > > + See <xref linkend="pg-stat-ssl-view"> for details. > > + </entry> > > + </row> > > + > > I kinda wonder why this even separate from pg_stat_activity, at least > from the POV of the function gathering the result. This way you have to > join between pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_ssl which will mean that the > two don't necessarily correspond to each other. > To keep from "cluttering" pg_stat_activity for the majority of users who are the ones not actually using SSL. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
