On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Dean, I've been working through your patches over the past couple of > days (apologies for the lack of updates, just been busy) and hope to > push them very shortly (ie: by the end of the weekend). > > One thing that I was hoping to discuss a bit is that I've gone ahead and > added another set of hooks, so we can have both "permissive" and > "restrictive" policies be provided from the hook. It's a bit late to > make the grammar and other changes which would be required to add a > "restrictive" policy option to the built-in RLS, but adding the hooks is > relatively low-impact.
I came up with something that is along the lines of what we discussed. I'll wait for you to push Dean's code, and rebase on top of that before submitting what I came up with. Maybe this can be rolled into my next revision if I work through Andres' most recent feedback without much delay. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
