On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:36:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:04:14PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> > Slightly improved patch applied. > >> > >> Is it? > > > > The patch has a slightly modified 'if' statement to check a constant > > before calling a function, and use elseif: > > > > < + if (!interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true) && > > cxt.hasoids) > > --- > > > + if (cxt.hasoids && !interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, > > true)) > > 47c57 > > < + if (interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true) && > > !cxt.hasoids) > > --- > > > + else if (!cxt.hasoids && interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, > > true)) > > > > I realize the change is subtle. > > What I meant was - I didn't see an attachment on that message.
I didn't attach it as people have told me they can just as easily see the patch via git, and since it was so similar, I didn't repost it. Should I have? I can easily do that. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
