On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:04:14PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> > Slightly improved patch applied. >> >> Is it? > > The patch has a slightly modified 'if' statement to check a constant > before calling a function, and use elseif: > > < + if (!interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true) && cxt.hasoids) > --- > > + if (cxt.hasoids && !interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true)) > 47c57 > < + if (interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true) && !cxt.hasoids) > --- > > + else if (!cxt.hasoids && interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, > true)) > > I realize the change is subtle.
What I meant was - I didn't see an attachment on that message. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
