On 2015-05-01 09:49:50 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > * Abbreviated key support for Datum sorts > > Unfortunately the discussion about potential performance regression > > has been largely sidestepped by bickering over minutiae. > > => ? > > There really is no discussion about performance regressions, because > there doesn't have to be. It's a straightfroward case of making what > already works for the heap tuple and B-Tree tuple sort cases work for > the Datum case. The costs and the benefits are the same. > > It was marked "ready for committer" some time ago.
Why is http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54e79f9c.4090...@2ndquadrant.com not worth a discussion? I don't see your response in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cam3swzty9fmrn9q8umsqn9bnedtjk68fkitomhhsxy2koyv...@mail.gmail.com really debating why it's definitely worth the cost. I'm not saying it's *not* worth it, just that it has to be considered. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
