On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> It's says: >> >> starting vacuum.... ERROR: blah >> ERROR: blah >> ERROR: blah >> done >> >> And then continues on. Sure, that's not the greatest error reporting >> output ever, but what do you expect from pgbench? I think it's clear >> enough what's going on there. The messages appear in quick >> succession, because it doesn't take very long to notice that the table >> isn't there, so it's not like you are sitting there going "wait, >> what?". >> >> If we're going to add something, I like your second suggestion >> "(ignoring this error and continuing anyway)" more than the first one. >> Putting "ignoring:" before the thing you plan to ignore will be >> confusing, I think. > > +1 to adding "(ignoring this error and continuing anyway)" and > committing this.
You want to take care of that? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
