On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-05-19 11:34:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> +1 for moving it at least 1 month. > > 2015-06-15 also collides with pgcon, which probably isn't the best > idea. I do think we should try hard doing a triage at the start of a CF > and not many with experience in the project are going to have time > around then. > > So, to where do we move it? We probably need to schedule at least the > first CF now. Just to 2015-07-15? That'd leave us enough room to > schedule the rest at pgcon.
That's in line with what I got in mind. >> There are many remaining open items. > > At least on https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items > there not really that many? On top of those items, many patches and features (I mean a lot!) have been committed just before the feature freeze deadline. I would think that those things should be looked at a second time by extra eyes. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
