On 2015-05-18 23:30:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> On 2015-05-19 11:34:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > >>> There are many remaining open items. > > >> At least on https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items > >> there not really that many? > > > On top of those items, many patches and features (I mean a lot!) have > > been committed just before the feature freeze deadline. I would think > > that those things should be looked at a second time by extra eyes.
Completely agreed that there's a lot of need for review and testing. I just wondered because of the reference to the open item list whether you were potentially thinking about something else. > I think if we spend the next month reviewing what's already in, we could > ship a credible beta before PGCon. And then maybe we could start 9.6 > development on 1 July, only a couple weeks late. 1st of July doesn't seem to leave much room to me. Even if we ship Beta1 before pgcon, the work doesn't stop there. At least I hope so, because if it does it will mean that nobody is testing beta 1. > But if we start focusing > on 9.6 development right now, which is what some current threads seem to > be after, 9.5 is going to be a disaster. FWIW, I personally don't intend to start actual significant new development till early/mid June. I think I, and probably some others, will have to have a couple design discussions until then though. For one it'll be hard to discuss things effectively at pgcon without that. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
