On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-05-20 15:37:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: >> > That does cover all bases, and users would be able to create the >> > operator which suits their particular use case easily. It's also fairly >> > similar to how jsquery works, although the syntax is completely different. >> >> > But ... it's after feature freeze. So, thoughts? >> >> I think this could be seen as a correction/bug fix for a pre-freeze >> feature. We should not be too resistant to filing down rough edges >> on new features, even if that involves a spec change. > > +1
+1, emphatically. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
