On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:26:56PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Noah Misch 2015-05-28 <20150528150234.ga4111...@tornado.leadboat.com>
> > To clarify for the archives, the 2015-05-16 changes did not revert to 9.3
> > and
> > earlier behavior. Rather, they standardized on the
> > {9.0,9.1,9.2}-to-{9.3,9.4}
> > upgrade behavior, bringing that behavior to all supported branches and
> > source
> > versions. Here is the history of timeline restoration in pg_upgrade:
>
> Ok, sorry for the noise then. It's not a regression, but I still think
> the behavior needs improvement, but this is indeed 9.6 material.
No, thank you for the report. It had strong signs of being a regression,
considering recent changes and the timing of your discovery.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
