On 29/05/15 12:59, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:26:56PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Noah Misch 2015-05-28 <20150528150234.ga4111...@tornado.leadboat.com>
To clarify for the archives, the 2015-05-16 changes did not revert to 9.3 and
earlier behavior. Rather, they standardized on the {9.0,9.1,9.2}-to-{9.3,9.4}
upgrade behavior, bringing that behavior to all supported branches and source
versions. Here is the history of timeline restoration in pg_upgrade:
Ok, sorry for the noise then. It's not a regression, but I still think
the behavior needs improvement, but this is indeed 9.6 material.
No, thank you for the report. It had strong signs of being a regression,
considering recent changes and the timing of your discovery.
From my experience, I would far rather a user raise concerns that are
important to them, and find there is no real problem, than users not
raising things and a serious bug or system shorting coming go unnoticed.
This is a major concern of mine, for example: in my current project,
where users were NOT raising problems in a timely manner, caused
unnecessary work rather later in the project than I would have liked!
So not just for PostgreSQL, but in general if a user has concerns,
please raise them!!!
Cheers,
Gavin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
