Josh, * Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote: > I would argue that if we delay 9.5 in order to do a 100% manual review > of code, without adding any new automated tests or other non-manual > tools for improving stability, then it's a waste of time; we might as > well just release the beta, and our users will find more issues than we > will. I am concerned that if we declare a cleanup period, especially in > the middle of the summer, all that will happen is that the project will > go to sleep for an extra three months.
This is the exact same concern that I have. A delay just to have a
delay is not useful. I completely agree that we need more automated
testing, etc, though getting all of that set up and running could be
done at any time too- there's no reason to wait, nor do I believe
delaying 9.5 would make such automated testing appear.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
