On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Painting it as the unilateral actions of one committer is uncharitable, > at best.
As I see it, it is just stating the facts. There were several emails from other committers on the pg_audit thread not that long before it was committed, and zero of them were supportive. None of them were dead-set against it, but it is not our typical way of doing business to press forward with committing something when that many doubts have been expressed. I believe you will struggle to find comparable examples involving other patches. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
