"Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On 07/01/2015 01:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
>>> At the very least I think we should start to rely on 'static inline's
>>> working. There is not, and hasn't been for a while, any buildfarm animal
>>> that does not support it
>> pademelon doesn't.
> Other reasoning aside, pademelon is running an HPUX version that is 10
> years old. I don't think we should care.
Try 16. The reason I run it is not because anyone cares about actually
running Postgres on such a machine; it's just so that we will know when
we are breaking compatibility with ancient C compilers. I brought it up
merely to refute Andres' claim that we do not have buildfarm coverage
of the case.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
