Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> Since, buildfarm/quiet inline test issues aside, pademelon is the only
> animal not supporting inlines and varargs, I think we should just go
> ahead and start to use both.
I'm good with using inlines, since as I pointed out upthread, that won't
actually break anything. I'm much less convinced that varargs macros
represent a winning tradeoff. Using those *will* irredeemably break
pre-C99 compilers, and AFAICS we do not have an urgent need for them.
(BTW, where are you drawing the conclusion that all these compilers
support varargs? I do not see a configure test for it.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
