On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > > Looks like one of the patches I applied is newer than the one in your list: > > > > HEAD Commit-id: 13a10c0ccd984643ef88997ac177da7c4b7e46a6 > > parallel-mode-v9.patch > > assess-parallel-safety-v4.patch > > parallel-heap-scan.patch > > parallel_seqscan_v11.patch > > This patch hasn't been updated for a while, so here is a rebased > version now that we're hopefully mostly done making changes to > pg_proc.h for 9.5. parallel-mode-v10 was mostly committed, and > parallel-heap-scan has now been incorporated into the parallel_seqscan > patch. So you should now be able to test this feature by applying > just this patch, and the new version of the parallel seqscan patch > which I am given to understand that Amit will be posting pretty soon. >
This patch again needs rebase, but anyway I think this should be present in the CF-1 as parallel seq scan patch is dependent on it. So I am moving this to upcoming CF unless there is any objection for doing so. I know that CF-1 time is already started, but just now realized that this patch should also be present in it. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
