On 2015-06-07 13:44:08 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > I'd like to advocate for back-patching this to 9.0, 9.1, and 9.2. It has > run without problems for a while now, and it can be considered a bug that > systems with a very large number of objects cannot be upgraded in a > reasonable time.
In that case, how about working on a version for <= 9.2 (single one should suffice)? This will likely include a bunch of wrapper functions to avoid changing the API in the back branches. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers