On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2015-06-07 13:44:08 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > > I'd like to advocate for back-patching this to 9.0, 9.1, and 9.2. It has > > run without problems for a while now, and it can be considered a bug that > > systems with a very large number of objects cannot be upgraded in a > > reasonable time. > > In that case, how about working on a version for <= 9.2 (single one > should suffice)? This will likely include a bunch of wrapper functions > to avoid changing the API in the back branches. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund > Unfortunately I don't know what that means about the API. Does it mean that none of the functions declared in any .h file can have their signatures changed? But new functions can be added? Thanks, Jeff
