On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Gianni <nasus.maxi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could there be a version of UPSERT where an update is tried, and if 0 records > are modified, an insert is done? > > Just wondering, I haven't got am use-case for that. I don't mid gaps in > sequences.
Perhaps, if you don't mind having a severely restricted set of qualifications in the UPDATE, which the existing command effectively has anyway. That would be a very odd thing. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
