Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 15 July 2015 at 16:28, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> I think that's generally a fair point. But here we're discussing to add >> a fair amount of wrinkles with the copy approach. The fact alone that >> the oid is different will have some ugly consequences.
> Why? We are creating a local temp table LIKE the global temp table. That is > already a supported operation. So there is no "different oid". You're presuming a specific implementation decision, one that has not been made yet, and isn't all that attractive because of the catalog bloat issues. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers