On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I've pushed a version of your patch. I just opted to remove p_is_update > instead of allowing both to be set at the same time. To me that seemed > simpler.
I would be hesitant to remove a struct field from a struct that appears as a hook argument. Someone's extension (that uses parser hooks) might have been relying on that. Perhaps not a big deal. Thanks -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
