On July 24, 2015 7:57:43 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: >On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> >wrote: >> I've pushed a version of your patch. I just opted to remove >p_is_update >> instead of allowing both to be set at the same time. To me that >seemed >> simpler. > >I would be hesitant to remove a struct field from a struct that >appears as a hook argument. Someone's extension (that uses parser >hooks) might have been relying on that. Perhaps not a big deal.
They'd also be affected by the change in meaning... --- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
