On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> The procgloballist stuff should be the subject of a separate patch >> which I agree with. > > Yes, I think that's probably a net improvement in robustness quite > apart from what we decide to do about any of the rest of this. I've > attached it here as revise-procglobal-tracking.patch and will commit > that bit if nobody objects.
In reviewing this thread I realized that I never got around to committing this bit. And it still seems like a good idea, so I've done that now. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
