On 2015-08-04 15:20:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > OK, so do we want to rip out all instances of the static inline dance > in favor of more straightforward coding? Do we then shut pandemelon > and any other affected buildfarm members down as unsupported, or what?
I think all that happens is that they'll log a couple more warnings about defined but unused static functions. configure already defines inline away if not supported. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
